Μείωση των αναγκών μετάγγισης σε ασθενείς με μυελοδυσπλαστικό σύνδρομο

Abstract

Introduction

The hypomethylating agent 5-azacytidine (AZA) has been the standard of care for higher risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) for the last few years. Its efficacy has been proven in large clinical trials, and its safety has been shown to be superior to that of conventional treatments. We have conducted a retrospective study about the efficacy and safety of 5-azacytidine, as reported and analyzed in our center.

Patients and Methods

Forty four consecutive patients with MDS or Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) with 20-30% bone marrow blasts that were treated with AZA during the last 63 months were included in the study. The clinical and laboratory characteristics of the patients were recorded, and the efficacy and safety data were analyzed.

Results

The epidemiologic and hematologic characteristics of the patients are shown in Table 1. The median overall survival was 13 months (1-101) and there was no primary treatment failure (Table 2). Serious adverse events consisted mostly of neutropenic infections (blood stream and pneumonia) (Table 3).

Discussion

Treatment with AZA offered a favorable (complete and partial) response in 34.1% of the patients, and an overall survival of 13 months, with generally predictable toxicities, although hospitalization was frequently inevitable during the first treatment cycles, when supportive treatment was a significant part of the management. A valuable observation is that there was a considerable decrease in the patients’ transfusion needs following treatment (p<0.0001). Our results are consistent with the results of other clinical trials and point out the need for investigational 5-azacytidine combinations.

Male: Female ratio 30:14 (2.1 : 1)
Age, Median (Range) 73 (54-81)
WHO classification of MDS/AML, N (%)
RAEB-I
RAEB-II
RCMD-RS
RCMD
RARS
CMML
AML
9 (20.5)
18 (40.9)
2 (4.5)
3 (6.7)
1 (2.3)
4 (9.1)
7 (15.9)
IPSS classification, N (%)
Low
Intermediate-1
Intermediate-2
High
Not Applicable (AML)
0 (0)
3 (6.8)
29 (65.9)
5 (11.4)
7 (15.9)
Complete Blood Count Parameters, Median (Range)
Hemoglobin (g/dL)
Absolute Neutrophil Count (x109/L)
Platelet count (x109/L)
8.55 (4.5 – 12.5)
1.08 (0.0 – 16.3)
80.0 (2 – 820)
Transfusion dependence, N (%) 39 (88.6)
Transfusions per month, Median (Range) 3 (0 – 7)

Table 1.

Epidemiologic and hematologic characteristics.

AZA cycles, Median (Range) 5 (1-22)
Actual AZA dose (mg/m2/cycle), Median (Range) 75 (59-75)
Actual cycle duration (days), Median (Range) 28 (28-40)
Dose reductions due to sustained neutropenia, N (%) 6 (13.6)
Temporary AZA interruption, N (%) 26 (59.1)
Reason
Sustained cytopenia 10/26 (38.5)
Neutropenic Infection 15/26 (57.7)
Hemorrhagic Complication 1/26 (3.8)
Permanent AZA discontinuation, N (%) 23/44 (52.3)
Reason
AML transformation 17/23 (73.9)
Recurrent or severe infection 4/23 (17.4)
Pyoderma gangrenosum 1/23 (4.3)
Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation 1/23 (4.3)
AZA cycles till response (according to the IWG criteria), Median (Range) 4 (1 – 7)
Response (IWG criteria), N (%)
Complete response
Partial response
Stable disease
Failure
7 (15.9)
8 (18.2)
29 (65.9)
0 (0)
Overall survival (months), Median (Range) 13 (1 – 101)
Post treatment transfusion dependence, N (%) 34 (77.3)
Transfusions per month (post-treatment), Median (Range) 1 (0 – 5)
Death rate, N (%) 29/44 (65.9)
Cause of death, N (%)
Infection
Hemorrhage
Cardiac dysrhythmia
24/29 (82.8)
3/29 (10.3)
2/29 (6.9)

Table 2.

Efficacy data

Clinical adverse events, N (%) 29/44 (65.9)
Neutropenic Infections 26/29 (89.7)
Bloodstream Infection 9/26 (34.6)
Lower respiratory infection 10/26 (38.5)
Neutropenic Fever 8/26 (30.1)
Septic shock 2/26 (7.7)
Hemorrhagic events 2/29 (6.7)
Cerebral hemorrhage (Grade 5) 1/2 (50.0)
Epistaxis (Grade 3) 1/2 (50.0)
Other (pyoderma gangrenosum) 1/29 (3.4)
Laboratory incidents1, N (%) 44/44 (100)
All grades Grades 3/4
Neutropenia 36/44 (81.8) 34/44 (77.3)
Anemia 44/44 (100) 24/44 (54.5)
Thrombocytopenia 31/44 (70.5) 21/44 (47.7)
Supportive treatment (during AZA administration), N (%)
GCSF administration 16/44 (36.4)
Erythropoietin administration 7/44 (15.9)
Red blood cell transfusions 39/44 (88.6)
Red blood cell transfusions (units/cycle), Median (range) 3 (0-7)
Pooled random donor platelet transfusions 17 (38.6)

Article Information

Citation
vol. 124 no. 21 5608

Print ISSN
Online ISSN
History
  • Published online December 4, 2014.


Contributors
  • Panagiotis Theodorou Diamantopoulos1National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon General Hospital, Athens, Greece
  • Konstantinos Zervakis [MD], 2National Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon General Hospital, Athens, Greece
  • Athanasios G. Galanopoulos3G. Gennimatas Hospital, Athens, Greece
  • Panagiotis Bakarakos4“G. Gennimatas” District General Hospital, Athens, Greece
  • Vasiliki Papadopoulou1National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon General Hospital, Athens, Greece
  • Theodoros Iliakis1National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon General Hospital, Athens, Greece
  • Fani Kalala1National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon General Hospital, Athens, Greece
  • Nefeli Giannakopoulou1National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon General Hospital, Athens, Greece
  • Niki Rougala1National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon General Hospital, Athens, Greece
  • Eleni Variami1National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon General Hospital, Athens, Greece
  • Aglaia Dimitrakopoulou5Laikon General Hospital, Athens, Greece
  • Nora-Athina Viniou1National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon General Hospital, Athens, Greece
Leave a reply